Loading...
Loading...
ReAct, Plan-and-Execute, Reflexion, and choosing the right architecture for your use case
Simple, reliable, widely used. The agent alternates between thinking and acting.
Pros: Simple, interpretable
Cons: Can loop, no explicit planning
The agent creates a plan first, then executes each step.
Pros: Better for complex tasks
Cons: Plans can be wrong
The agent does a task, critiques its own result, and retries.
Pros: Self-improving
Cons: Uses more tokens
Multiple specialized agents collaborate via an orchestrator.
Pros: Specialization, parallelism
Cons: Complex to build
| Task | Recommended |
|---|---|
| Simple Q&A with tools | ReAct |
| Complex workflow | Plan-and-Execute |
| Code generation | ReAct + Reflexion |
| Research | Multi-Agent |
Which architecture for each?